You were the best person in the room

Two resources worth bookmarking before you read on:

The door had barely closed before someone said it. "I didn't feel enough energy." The candidate had answered every question well. She knew the market and understood the role. Her example of fixing a failed client account was stronger than anything the other candidates offered. Still, the panel kept returning to energy. Nobody could explain what was missing from her answers. They just hadn't felt the excitement they expected from someone who wanted the role.

One panel member said the other candidate had "owned the room." I asked what that candidate had said to show stronger judgement. The room went silent.

This is where interviews go wrong. People believe they're discussing evidence when they're often discussing how a candidate made them feel. The calm candidate gets called less interested. The animated one gets called more capable. The words change. The judgement was made much earlier.

If you’re a decision maker at your company, you need to be on the bleeding edge of, well, everything. But before you go signing up for seminars, conferences, lunch ‘n learns, and all that jazz, just know there’s a far better (and simpler) way: Subscribing to The Deep View.

This daily newsletter condenses everything you need to know about the latest and greatest AI developments into a 5-minute read. Squeeze it into your morning coffee break and before you know it, you’ll be an expert too.

Subscribe right here. It’s totally free, wildly informative, and trusted by 600,000+ readers at Google, Meta, Microsoft, and beyond.

Interviews are built around a strange problem. A company wants to know how you'll perform over months or years, and it makes that call after a short conversation with strangers. That leaves plenty of room for first impressions to take over. The American Psychological Association's work on first impressions explains that people form judgements about personality in milliseconds. Some of those judgements carry useful information. Others come from stereotypes that have nothing to do with the job.

This can hurt introverts, because many of us don't show interest through high energy. We show it through preparation, or through the quality of the answer itself. A panel can still read calm as indifference.

A Stanford study on hiring and ideal affect found that American raters preferred excited applicants over equally qualified calm ones, while Hong Kong Chinese raters did not. Preference for visible energy is cultural, not universal, and that matters for any European panel importing American hiring instincts without noticing. A separate Stanford-led study sharpens the point further: relying on passion as a hiring signal costs companies talent, especially from candidates whose cultures don't reward visible enthusiasm. What looks like passion is often just the part the candidate rehearsed best.

You can't remove interview bias from the room, however hard you try. But you can make it harder for the room to ignore your evidence.

Start with four stories from your work. Choose one where you solved a difficult problem. Choose another where you changed someone's mind. Add a story about a mistake you repaired. Finish with a case where you helped a team succeed without owning the final decision.

For each story, write the situation and what you did. Give your actions more space than the background. Then write the result in plain terms. What changed? What did the company gain? What problem stopped happening?

These stories become your proof file. You're not trying to memorise a speech. You're building material you can use under pressure.

Structured interviews work better because candidates answer job-related questions and get judged against common standards. The OPM guidance notes that greater structure improves reliability and reduces the impact of interviewer discretion. You can bring some of that structure into an unstructured interview yourself. When someone asks, "Tell me about yourself," don't give them your life story. Give them a clear professional line.

"I'm strongest when the work needs careful analysis and clear follow-through. A recent example was…"

Then use the evidence.

Prepare for the judgement the interview is likely to make. If you tend to sound flat when nervous, practise saying your first answer aloud. Don't try to become more animated than you are. Make sure your voice carries the interest you actually feel. If your answers run long, practise giving the result earlier.

Try this: "The result was a 15% reduction in delays. I got there by changing the handover process." That gives the panel a reason to keep listening.

You can also ask questions that steer the interview toward real work.
"What problem would you want the person in this role to solve first?"
"How will you judge success after six months?"
"What does strong performance look like when the role gets difficult?"
A good question changes how the panel sees you. You arrive as a candidate assessing the work, not a candidate waiting to be judged on it. Preparation won't make every interview fair. But it will stop weak structure from hiding your strongest evidence.

If you're an extroverted interviewer, you may feel more natural chemistry with a candidate who responds quickly and shows visible interest. That feeling is useful for conversation. It isn't enough to decide a job on. Before you back a candidate, ask yourself which answer showed the strongest judgement. Look at what they did and the result they got.

You can help further by keeping the panel tied to the same questions. A candidate shouldn't lose because one interviewer simply enjoyed the conversation more. The role needs the best person for the work, and the interview exists to help you find them.

I built my own proof file before I started coaching other introverts through interviews, and it changed how I prepared for every conversation that mattered. Here's the prompt I'd hand you if we were working through this together.

Four stories, ready before you need them.

Choose one interview question you find difficult. Record your answer once. Listen for the point where the useful detail begins. Move that part closer to the start, then record it again. You're doing this to make your evidence easier to hear.

The Introvert's First 90 Days


Why trying to look settled can ruin a strong start.

Interviews don't always reward the person who can do the job. They often reward the person who makes competence easy to recognise in a short conversation. That may be unfair. It's also the room you have to work with. Walk in with your evidence ready. State the result first, then the story. Let your depth become visible before the panel fills the gap with its own.

In your corner,
— Steven

P.S. Know someone walking into an interview this month? Forward this. It might be the difference between them explaining their value and someone assuming it.

P.P.S. Ever wondered why the room remembers energy and forgets evidence?Download the free guide: From Invisible to Unforgettable and start changing how you’re seen before you walk in.